Rallies: University of Cincinnati and Miami University Students Unite Against Hate


From UC Alliance: 

Rallies: University of Cincinnati and Miami University Students Unite Against Hate  
Coinciding rallies in Cincinnati and Oxford planned in response to anti-gay hate crimes

CINCINNATI April 5 2012 – This Thursday, Students at Miami University and the University of Cincinnati will hold coinciding rallies at 5pm in Oxford and Cincinnati, respectively, in response to a brutal hate crime that left two gay students bloody and battered early Sunday morning in Oxford.


WHAT: Miami University and University of Cincinnati Anti-Violence Rallies
WHEN: Thursday, April 5 2012 at 5pm
WHO: Miami’s Spectrum and UC’s Alliance 
WHERE: University of Cincinnati students will convene at the corner of Martin Luther King Drive and Clifton Ave while Miami students will gather at the Phi Delt Gates on Miami’s Campus.


###

UC Alliance is a student group that aims to develop interpersonal relationships in a social and educational atmosphere through activities and events for the LGBTQ community and its allies. 

Miami Spectrum is a visible support group of involved students that creates a safe and supportive Miami-Oxford community by promoting education and awareness around LGBTQA issues


What's Race Got to Do With It? - Apr 5th!


From Cincinnati Public Allies:
What’s Race Got to Do With It is a conversation hosted by social justice organizations, BRIDGES and Public Allies, designed to offer a venue for dialogue around the myriad of issues related to race and class as manifested in the recent local and national events of violence. The death of an unarmed black male, Trayvon Martin, and the freedom of the assailant bring to mind the long history of socially sanctioned violence that is at the core of American race relations, and millions of people around the world have marched for justice on his behalf.

According to BRIDGES’ news release, in lieu of equally disparaging local incidents of violence toward children, this dialogue will examine the educational, cultural and social disparities that stem from issues of race and class, and how these issues affect a child’s ability to succeed. Strategic partners include Serve Ohio, Strive Partnership, The National Underground Railroad Freedom Center, and others.

Special Guest Speakers: Law Enforcement and Behavioral Specialists including Dr. Keith Vukasinovic, clinical counselor; Capt. Gary Lee, Cincinnati Police Department, Dorothy Smoot, Executive Director of the Community Police Partnering Center and Vice President of Youth Services for the Urban League of Greater Cincinnati, Cheryl Meadows, retired Executive Director of the Cincinnati Human Relations Council, and other behavioral and educational specialists.

Where: Woodward High School, 7005 Reading Road, Cincinnati, OH 45237
When: Thursday, April 5 6:00-8pm

how we found ourselves in a fair world

When I was a boy in the early 1960s, my sister and the civil rights struggle taught me about fairness. My sister always insisted on candy and comic books being shared equally with her and our little brother—I could never convince her I should have more because I was older or male. And Florida’s segregated schools, which claimed to be "separate but equal" while giving far more to white schools than black ones, showed me there's no equality without equal resources.

Fairness may be simple for children because they don't have power and therefore don't have to rationalize it, but some adults say some people deserve more than others—and then they define "deserve" in a way that includes them. My favorite answer to that is from Hamlet: "Use every man after his desert, and who should 'scape whipping?

If the world's wealth were shared today, each adult on the planet would have money and possessions equal to $43,800 US. If the world's income were shared, over the coming year, each person, regardless of age, would get $10,500. In that world, Emma and I would have a shared wealth of $87,600 and a shared income of $21,000. If we had children, each child would add $10,500 a year to our household. Since we don't have children, by the end of the year, we would expect our combined wealth and income, excluding expenses, to be $108,600.

Which is about what we're looking at for 2012.

Which makes us richer than we've ever been.

And as rich as everyone could be.

*

We never planned to live in a fair world. For most of our life together, we've lived very simply. We're writers, and only the best-selling few manage to become rich. For the last six years, we were the caretakers at an artist's retreat, which meant we lived cheaply in a beautiful place, and though we were poor, we knew we were lucky to be able to do what we loved.

Then my sister died unexpectedly, leaving us enough to pay our debts and have almost exactly what we would in a fair world.

So we loaded our worldly goods into a small moving pod:

(photo by Ellen Kushner)

And we drove our twelve-year-old Toyota Echo to Minneapolis, where we bought a 700-square-foot house for $75,000.

*

Now, when I say everyone could have as much as Emma and I currently do, I'm not arguing that fairness requires perfect economic equality. Everyone's needs are different. But the logic of fairness calls for a small gap between the richest and the poorest. A survey by Michael I. Norton and Dan Ariely compared the distribution of wealth in the US with what Americans think it is and what they think it should be. Most Americans think the richest 20% should own 32% of the country's wealth; today, the richest 20% own 84%. Most Americans think the poorest 20% should own a little over 10% of the country's wealth; today, the poorest 20% own 0.1%.

I'm also not suggesting that our lives this year will be a perfect model of what life would be like in a fair world. We're in the United States, where health care and education cost much more than anywhere else—a better model of life in a fair world would be set in a country like Norway or Canada.

But we have to begin where we are.

*

It's impossible to anticipate every objection I might get, but I'll take on one now:

Some people will say that having a fair share of the wealth is a privilege. Their objection comes from something valid: in a world where the rich take so much, few people get their fair share. But privilege is not the absence of oppression. Privilege requires having more than your fair share. You may argue that privilege begins when you have a penny more or a million dollars more, but there's no privilege in having what everyone could. In this world, there's only luck.

And in our case, it was a very hard form of good luck. I will miss my sister until I die.

*

Soon: All about our finances. An intimate look at how close Emma and I come to living in a fair world.

*

Recommended reading:

[PDF] Global Wealth Report - Credit Suisse eMagazine

Mapping Global Wealth | OtherWords

Who Rules America: Wealth, Income, and Power

It's the Inequality, Stupid | Mother Jones

The Real Wealth of US Households by the Numbers | Daily Reckoning

By the Numbers: A Closer Look at the Real Wealth of US Households | Daily Reckoning